United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM SD
SPECIALIZED DISCLOSURE REPORT
|
PVH CORP.
|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Delaware
|
001-07572
|
13-1166910
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(Commission
File Number)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
200 Madison Avenue
New York, New York
|
10016
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
Mark D. Fischer
|
|
212-381-3500
|
|
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the
person to contact in connection with this report.)
|
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
X Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the
reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2018.
Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report
A Conflict Minerals Report is attached as an exhibit to this Form SD and is available on our corporate website, PVH.com, as permitted by Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Form SD. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form SD or our Conflict Minerals Report and should not be considered part of this Form SD or the Conflict Minerals Report.
Item 1.02 Exhibit
The Conflict Minerals Report provided for in Item 1.01 is filed as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD.
Section 2 – Exhibits
Item 2.01 Exhibits
Exhibit 1.01 – Conflict Minerals Report for the calendar year that ended December 31, 2018.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
|
PVH CORP.
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: /s/ Mark D. Fischer
|
Date: May 31, 2019
|
|
Name: Mark D. Fischer
Title: Executive Vice President
|
|
Exhibit Index
|
Exhibit
|
Description
|
|
1.01
|
Conflict Minerals Report for the calendar year that ended December 31, 2018.
|
Exhibit 1.01
Conflict Minerals Report
PVH Corp. (together with its subsidiaries, "PVH," the "Company," "we," "us" or "our") has included this Conflict Minerals Report (the "Report") as an exhibit to its Form SD for 2018, as permitted under Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and Form SD (together, the "Rule"). Both the Form SD and the Report are being filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on May 31, 2019.
As used herein and consistent with the Rule, "Conflict Minerals" or "3TG" are columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite, and three specified derivatives: tantalum, tin, and tungsten. 3TG that are necessary to the functionality or production of our products are referred to herein as "Necessary 3TG." Our products that contain Necessary 3TG are referred to herein as "In-scope Products." The terms "adjoining country" and "armed group," as used in this Report, have the meanings contained in the Rule.
Executive Summary
3TG were not necessary to the functionality or production of the vast majority of our products. Therefore, those products are not subject to disclosure under the Rule. For the small number of our products that contained 3TG, 3TG usually constituted a small portion of the content.
We typically are many levels removed from the market participants that source 3TG used in the components of our products and our supply chain is constantly evolving and geographically diverse. As a result, we were unable to determine the origin of all of the Necessary 3TG contained in our In-scope Products. However, we have no knowledge that even the small amounts of Necessary 3TG in our products originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or any adjoining countries (collectively, the "Covered Countries").
This Report discusses the steps we have taken to ensure that our and our suppliers' sourcing practices are consistent with our commitment to high moral and ethical standards and our Conflict Minerals Policy (the "Policy"), which is described below.
Applicability of the Conflict Minerals Rule to Our Company
We are one of the largest branded apparel companies in the world, with a history going back over 135 years. We have over 38,000 associates operating in over 40 countries. Our brand portfolio consists of nationally and internationally recognized brands, including the global designer lifestyle brands, CALVIN KLEIN and Tommy Hilfiger, as well as Van Heusen, IZOD, ARROW, Warner's, Olga, Eagle, True&Co. and Geoffrey Beene. We also license brands from third parties, including Speedo (licensed in perpetuity for North America and the Caribbean), Kenneth Cole New York, Kenneth Cole Reaction, Unlisted, a Kenneth Cole Production, MICHAEL Michael Kors, Michael Kors Collection, DKNY and Chaps. Our brand portfolio also includes various other owned, licensed and private label brands.
We are subject to the Rule because we are a public company with securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. While we do not have direct manufacturing operations that use 3TG, we are required to file a Form SD because we contract to manufacture products that contain Necessary 3TG.
Our Conflict Minerals Policy
PVH has long been committed to maintaining high moral and ethical standards that reflect honesty, integrity and reliability in every situation. In furtherance thereof and for the purposes of the Rule, PVH has adopted the Policy to encourage our suppliers to respect human rights and not to contribute to conflicts in the Covered Countries.
The Policy states clearly that we expect suppliers who supply to or manufacture components, parts or products for PVH that contain 3TG to:
|
1.
|
obtain those minerals from socially and environmentally responsible sources that do not directly or indirectly contribute to conflict or human rights abuses, including sourcing 3TG only from sources that do not directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in a Covered Country;
|
|
2.
|
implement and communicate to their personnel practices and policies that are consistent with the Policy;
|
|
3.
|
familiarize themselves with the Rule and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (the "Guidance");
|
|
4.
|
put in place procedures for the traceability of 3TG, working with their suppliers, as appropriate;
|
|
5.
|
where possible, source 3TG from smelters and refiners validated as being conflict free by independent third parties;
|
|
6.
|
maintain reviewable business records on the source of 3TG;
|
|
7.
|
provide us with written certifications and other information concerning the origin of 3TG included in products, components and parts supplied to us and the supplier's compliance with the Policy generally, upon request;
|
|
8.
|
adopt a risk management strategy with respect to identified risks in the supply chain that is consistent with the Policy;
|
|
9.
|
otherwise establish policies, due diligence procedures and management systems that are consistent with the Guidance; and
|
|
10.
|
expect their direct and indirect suppliers to adopt policies and procedures that are consistent with those contained in the Policy.
|
The Policy also encourages suppliers to support industry efforts to enhance traceability and responsible practices in the global minerals supply chain.
Additionally, the Policy provides that, upon learning of a violation, we may require a supplier to commit to and implement a corrective action plan within a reasonable timeframe. Finally, the Policy provides that continued failure to adhere to the Policy or refusal to address issues of concern may lead us to terminate our business relationship with the supplier.
Neither the Policy nor PVH condones a general embargo on sourcing from the Covered Countries.
Product Scoping; Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry Information
As required by the Rule, for 2018, we conducted a "reasonable country of origin inquiry" ("RCOI"). Our RCOI was reasonably designed to determine in good faith whether any of the 3TG in our In-scope Products originated in a Covered Country or from recycled or scrap sources. For our RCOI, we utilized the management systems contemplated by Step One of the Guidance, including the Supplement on Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten and the Supplement on Gold (Third Edition), and the supplier engagement process contemplated by Step Two of the Guidance. These steps and the related activities are discussed below under "Due Diligence Measures."
Our product scoping process included an internal review to determine which of our products categories contain, are likely to contain, or may contain any of the 3TG, and which active suppliers manufactured those products for our Company ("Covered Suppliers").
To collect information for our RCOI, we sent the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (the "CMRT") developed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (the "RMI") to the approximately 600 Covered Suppliers identified in our internal review. We also provided these Covered Suppliers with a cover email and materials explaining the requirements of the Conflict Minerals Rule and our expectations for compliance with the Rule and our Policy. Upon request, we also provided our Covered Supplies with training materials on the Rule and our Policy. Our review of the Covered Suppliers' responses is discussed under "Due Diligence Measures."
We received completed CMRTs from 100% of our active Covered Suppliers. We were unable to obtain CMRTs from a handful of Covered Suppliers that were exited from our supply chain for reasons unrelated to Conflict Minerals. However, based on these discontinued Covered Suppliers' previous CMRTs, and our strict requirement that suppliers use only nominated trim suppliers, we do not believe that products or components supplied to us by them contained 3TG originating from Covered Countries.
Pursuant to the Rule, based on the results of our RCOI, we conducted the due diligence discussed below.
Due Diligence Measures
For our 2018 due diligence, we followed the criteria set forth in the Guidance.
The Guidance provides for a five-step framework for due diligence as a basis for responsible global supply chain management of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Selected elements of our due diligence program are discussed below. The headings below conform to the headings used in the Guidance for each of the five steps of the framework.
|
1.
|
Step One; Establish strong company management systems:
|
|
a.
|
We maintain the Policy. We communicate the Policy internally and externally by posting it on our corporate website, PVH.com and by distributing it to all of our suppliers and licensees.
|
|
b.
|
We have a Conflict Minerals working group of senior associates, led by our Associate General Counsel, Global Compliance, who work on our Conflict Minerals compliance strategy. This working group includes representatives from Corporate Responsibility, legal and sourcing. Working group members are educated on the Rule, the Guidance, our compliance plan and the procedures for reviewing and validating supplier responses to our inquiries. For 2018, we provided training to our supply chain leads, to enable them to better explain our requirements to Covered Suppliers. We also use outside counsel with expertise on compliance and reporting under the Rule to assist us with our compliance efforts.
|
|
c.
|
We use the CMRT developed by the RMI to gather supply chain information. We maintain business records relating to our 3TG due diligence, including responses to the CMRT, findings and resulting decisions, for at least five years.
|
|
d.
|
Our standard supplier agreement and licensee agreement contain provisions that explain the Company's expectations and our suppliers' obligations under the Rule. The Policy is also attached to these agreements.
|
|
e.
|
We provide associates, suppliers and other interested parties with internal and external channels to report violations of the Policy. These reports can be made anonymously to the extent allowed by applicable law.
|
|
2.
|
Step Two; Identify and assess risk in the supply chain:
|
|
a.
|
Covered Suppliers were asked to provide us with information, through the completion of the CMRT, concerning the usage and source of 3TG in the products that they manufacture for us. For 2018, we sent emails to each of our approximately 600 Covered Suppliers explaining our obligations under the Rule and the Policy, and requesting that they complete the CMRT. We followed up by email and telephone with all Covered Suppliers that did not respond within a specified timeframe.
|
|
b.
|
We reached out to those Covered Suppliers that failed to provide a completed CMRT for 2017 in a timely fashion or that had initially provided incomplete information, providing them with information on our compliance obligations under the Rule and our Policy, as well as with training on the Rule.
|
|
c.
|
We reviewed the Covered Suppliers' completed CMRTs and followed up on any response that appeared to be inaccurate or incomplete. In each case, we requested a revised or more detailed response and continued to follow up as appropriate.
|
|
d.
|
We and our outside counsel with expertise in supply chain compliance separately and reviewed the smelter and refiner information provided by the Covered Suppliers against the RMI's Smelter Look-up tab list. Smelter and refiner information was also reviewed against the lists of "conformant" and "active" smelters and refiners published by the RMI.
|
|
e.
|
To the extent that a smelter or refiner identified by a Covered Supplier was not listed as "active" or "conformant" by the RMI, we consulted publicly available information or attempted to contact the smelter or refiner to determine whether it obtained 3TG from sources that directly or indirectly financed or supported armed groups in a Covered Country. For 2018, approximately 98% of the smelters and refiners identified by our Covered Suppliers as a source of Necessary 3TG were listed as "conformant." The remaining 2% did not exhibit any red flags that would indicate that they directly or indirectly financed or supported armed groups in a Covered Country.
|
|
3.
|
Step Three; Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks:
|
|
a.
|
Our Associate General Counsel, Global Compliance reported the findings of our Conflict Minerals supply chain risk assessment to our General Counsel, Chief Supply Chain Officer and Chief Risk Officer.
|
|
b.
|
We address identified risks on a case-by-case basis. This flexible approach enables us to tailor the response to the risks identified.
|
|
4.
|
Step Four; Carry out independent third-party audits of supply chain due diligence at identified points in the supply chain:
|
To the extent that smelters or refiners are identified, we and our outside counsel with expertise in supply chain compliance utilize information made available by the RMI concerning independent third-party audits of smelters and refiners.
|
5.
|
Step 5; Report on supply chain due diligence:
|
We file a Form SD and a Conflict Minerals Report with the SEC. These filings are also available on our corporate website, PVH.com.
Product Information
We do not contract to manufacture many products that contain Necessary 3TG. Indeed, a majority of our products – consisting primarily of apparel – do not contain any 3TG at all.
Our Covered Suppliers identified a total of 49 smelters and refiners that potentially sourced 3TG for our In-Scope Products. Of these 49 smelters and refiners, 16 were tin smelters and 33 were gold refiners. As of May 17, 2019, 48 of these smelters and refiners were listed as "conformant" by the RMI (16, or 100%, of the tin smelters and 32, or 97%, of the gold refiners were listed as "conformant"). The remaining processor did not exhibit any red flags that would indicate that it directly or indirectly financed or supported armed groups in a Covered Country.
As the Covered Suppliers generally provided information at a company level, and not a product level, we were largely unable to determine the smelters and refiners specific to the Necessary 3TG in our In-scope Products or the related country of origin, but we have no knowledge that any of the smelters or refiners source their 3TG from any of the Covered Countries.
For a further discussion of our products, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year that ended February 3, 2019. The information contained in our Form 10-K is not incorporated by reference into this Report or our Form SD and should not be considered part of this Report or our Form SD.
Additional Risk Mitigation Efforts
In order to further mitigate the risk that the Necessary 3TG contained in our In-scope Products benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries, for 2019, in addition to the due diligence explained above, we plan to:
|
1.
|
require the completion of a CMRT as part of the exiting process of all Covered Suppliers, to ensure that we receive 3TG origin information from inactive, as well as active, suppliers; and
|
|
2.
|
offer training on the Rule and our Policy for all Covered Suppliers that reported using 3TG in products manufactured for us in 2018, and provide training to any other supplier that requests additional instruction.
|